Many initially believed that Alan’s Movement for Change would be a refreshing alternative to the dominance of the NPP and NDC.
However, his choice of a running mate has revealed much about his political mindset. A significant number of observers have argued that the traditional Muslim-Northerner ticket has long been a winning formula for major political parties seeking to secure power.
Unfortunately, Alan’s decision to select Elijah Kwame Owusu Danso, Esq. as his running mate may prove to be a major strategic miscalculation.
The decision wasn’t a surprise to some, especially after prominent figures like Saddique Boniface and others joined forces with Alan—a figure celebrated for his impeccable record of public service. Yet, many are now questioning whether the goal of the Movement for Change is truly to form a government or merely to split the Asante vote, thereby pushing the NPP into opposition.
For those who understand Ghanaian political dynamics, it seems that Alan missed an opportunity. Abu Sakara and Hon. Boniface Saddique Abubakar, both hailing from Gonjaland, would have been stronger choices. Their candidacies would have posed a serious threat to both the NDC and NPP. Abu Sakara, a seasoned campaigner with great resources and strong communication skills, and Hon. Boniface, a veteran politician with a track record of winning elections across constituencies, represent formidable alternatives.
Boniface, in particular, is known for his role as a former minister who held several portfolios and is credited with bringing peace to Dagbon through the burial of the Ya Naa.
Alan’s decision to become the first independent presidential candidate has now been overshadowed by his questionable choice of a running mate.
His move seems less about winning and more about splitting the Asante vote, which could pave the way for an NDC victory. A partnership with the New Force—and aligning with Nana Kwame Cheddar’s 12-pillared economic transformation plan—would have boosted Alan’s chances.
The reasoning behind Alan’s pick has raised eyebrows, suggesting a lack of credible political strategy. Hon. Boniface’s loyalty to his party and Abu Sakara’s experience were overlooked, and now only time will tell how this choice will play out. Time, after all, remains the ultimate judge in politics.
Lord Ken (Geopolitical Security Analyst)
